Talk:Holo/@comment-216.61.238.254-20160515203314/@comment-208.191.29.86-20160605041546

....to the amateur philosopher wiki contributer, that doesn't make sense nor does it answer my question. First of all, let's go back to Zeus. Zeus, though the king of the Olympian gods, was created by Chronos and Rhea so there was a "god" above Zeus. Chronos and Rhea were created by Uranus and Gaia so there were gods above them as well. Uranus and Gaia were created by Chaos the primordial so there is a "god" above those two as well. So Zeus, the king of the Olympian gods has three sets of "gods" above him, there is no question of that, and so knowing this how could he be an agnostic, which by it's definition is a person who aknowledges the exsistence of a higher power but does not know what that power is, when he knows who the higher power is. The same is true with Holo. It's not a question of who created her, her parents probably did, it's a question of who she believes the higher power is. The answer is, she is the higher power. It's not unreasonable to assume that Holo would believe that, she is a pagan diety after all, and it wouldn't make sense for her to belive in God. So how can Holo be an agnostic when agnostics don't know who or what the higher power is? And no offense to the people reading this who are agnostic, I don't mean to be casual with your philosophical or theological beliefs.

Second of all though wiki user is that I actually take offense with your statement that "These questions can nly be posed if we are those persons or know of such.".....I take offense to that because you've just declared that we don't have the right to ask questions unless we already know the answer or know the person who can tell us. That we have no right to ask, wonder, learn, and think. Maybe that's probably not what you meant but it came out that way.